& 1987 storm 2018 3ATC 50th annual accreditation advice AFL AGM Agrilus Biguttatus aid air quality Alex Kirkley amenity Amenity Conference APPGHG apprentice apprenticeship Apprenticeships Approved Contractors ARB ARB Approved Contractor ARB Approved Contractors ARB Magazine ARB Show Arboriculture arborists Arbsafe ash dieback Assessments atf Australia award Barcham Trees Bartlett Tree Experts bats beetle beyond ism biodiversity biosecurity Branches Brexit bs5837 business Call for papers CEnv chainsaw chalara Charles charter Charter for Trees chelsea Chelsea Flower Show Claus Mattheck climate climber climbing Colleges competiton conference Confor conifers conservation Consultant consultation Coroner Council Countryside Stewardship cross industry news Cryphonectria parasitica Cumbria DART Date for your diary death defra Design Devon disease document dothistroma EAC East Anglia ecology economy Ecotricity education Electricity England EPF Europe European Arboricultural Council exeter Exhibitors Fatality Fera flood flooding Forest Research forestry Forestry Commission forests FSC Fund4Trees funding fundraiser gardening GDPR government Green Brexit guidance guides Health Helliwell Help Horse Chestnut horticulture HRH HRH Prince Charles HS2 HSE ICF International Urban Forestry Congress Irma ISA iso i-Tree IUFC Kew land-based Landscape Institute landscaping Lantra law Leaf Minor London LTOA Melbourne mentor Midlands NASA National Geographic National Tree Week News nominations Northern notification NTIS NTOA NTOC oak Oak Processionary Moth Oak-boring Beetle obituary Observatree opm Padua parks parliament Perennial petition Phytophthora planning Planning Law planting Plumpton College policy poll Prince Charles Prince of Wales Protect and Survive protection ramorum Registered Registered Consultant Report research response review RFS rhs Rodney Helliwell rogue tree surgeons Safety Safety Bulletin Scotland Scottish Branch SDG Accord security seminars Share Sheffield Show SocEnv soils South East staff statement statutory strategy student survey Sweet Chestnut sweet chestnut blight TDAG Technical Officers tender Thames & Chiltern The Arboricultural Association The Woodland Trust Thinking Arbs Day TPO Trading Standards trailblazer training transport Tree Tree Council Tree Inspection tree loss tree management Tree Officer tree species Tree Surgeons Tree Week tree-felling trees Trees, People and the Built Environment trust' TrustMark UAG Uitlity UK favourite ukas UKWAS urban forest Urban Tree Cover urban trees VETcert veteran trees video Videos volunteer VTA Wales website Western women in arboriculture woodland woodland trust woods young arborists

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Arboricultural Association.

Share this story

The Environmental Policy Forum Warn that the EU Withdrawal Bill is Inadequate

Last Updated:  20/10/2017

The Society for the Environment partnered with seven other professional bodies*, as part of the Environmental Policy Forum, to warn that the EU Withdrawal Bill is inadequate to deliver Gove’s “Green Brexit” vision of healthier environment.

As MPs begin to debate the landmark European Union (Withdrawal) Bill, leading environmental scientists, engineers, ecologists and water and waste experts have called for meaningful parliamentary scrutiny of environmental policies and laws.

Whilst the Conservative Government committed in its manifesto to “be the first generation to leave the environment in a better state than it inherited” and Environment Secretary Michael Gove has talked of his ambition for a “Green Brexit”, a range of professional bodies have warned that the EU Withdrawal Bill “gravely threatens” the ability to achieve either.

In letters to Michael Gove and David Davis, the institutes have warned that the Bill fails to adequately provide for parliamentary scrutiny of the raft of changes required to make environmental laws function, ensure the fundamental principles which underpin decades of environmental improvement are protected, or provide a meaningful framework for independent scrutiny of future Government performance on the environment. They also warned that devolved administrations should not be constrained from pursuing ambitious environmental policies and targets of their own as a result of the powers the Bill creates.

The bodies have called for the legal establishment of a new body, answerable to Parliament and fully independent of Government which would help provide the kind of scrutiny currently provided by the European Commission. In the past this has allowed citizens and organisations to take governments to court over failing to meet legal obligations such as on air quality. The bodies have also called for parliamentary committees to rubber stamp or call in for scrutiny the large number of laws which Ministers can approve, under so called ‘Henry VIII powers’, as EU laws are made workable in the UK.

Environmental Policy Forum Chair, Professor Will Pope said:

“the Government has welcome ambitions for the environment, with a new 25 year plan imminent and a commitment to improve environmental quality for future generations. Yet plans without appropriate tools and measures for delivery and scrutiny will be doomed to failure. Brexit offers certain opportunities to manage our environment in a more effective manner, more bespoke to UK needs. Yet it also presents real risks that measures which have achieved cleaner rivers, seas, towns and cities could be eroded. We are calling for appropriate checks and balances to be established from the outset, to ensure we do not risk becoming the ‘dirty man of Europe’ again”.

View the Environmental Policy Forum’s EU Withdrawal Briefing here.

Find out more about the Society's work on the EU Withdrawal Bill here.

*IEMA, the Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management (CIWEM), the Institution of Environmental Sciences (IES), the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management (CIEEM), the chartered Institution of Wastes Management (CIWM), the Institute of Fisheries Management (IFM) and the Landscape Institute.