& 1987 storm 2018 3ATC 50th annual accreditation AFL AGM Agrilus Biguttatus aid air quality Alex Kirkley amenity Amenity Conference APPGHG apprentice apprenticeship Apprenticeships Approved Contractors ARB ARB Approved Contractor ARB Magazine ARB Show Arboriculture arborists Arbsafe ash dieback Assessments atf Australia award Barcham Trees Bartlett Tree Experts bats beyond ism biodiversity biosecurity Brexit bs5837 business Call for papers CEnv chainsaw chalara Charles charter Charter for Trees chelsea Chelsea Flower Show Claus Mattheck climate climber climbing competiton conference Confor conifers conservation Consultant consultation Council Countryside Stewardship cross industry news Cryphonectria parasitica Cumbria DART death defra Design Devon disease document dothistroma EAC ecology economy Ecotricity education Electricity England EPF Europe European Arboricultural Council exeter Exhibitors Fera flood flooding Forest Research forestry Forestry Commission forests FSC Fund4Trees funding fundraiser gardening government Green Brexit guidance guides Health Help Horse Chestnut horticulture HRH HRH Prince Charles HS2 HSE ICF Irma ISA iso i-Tree Kew land-based Landscape Institute landscaping Lantra law Leaf Minor London LTOA Melbourne mentor NASA National Geographic National Tree Week News nominations notification NTIS NTOA oak Oak-boring Beetle obituary Observatree opm Padua parks parliament Perennial petition Phytophthora planning planting Plumpton College policy poll Prince Charles Prince of Wales Protect and Survive protection ramorum Registered Registered Consultant Report research response review RFS rhs rogue tree surgeons Safety Scotland Scottish Branch SDG Accord security seminars Share Sheffield Show SocEnv soils staff statement statutory strategy student survey Sweet Chestnut sweet chestnut blight TDAG Technical Officers tender The Arboricultural Association The Woodland Trust TPO Trading Standards trailblazer training transport Tree Tree Council tree loss tree management Tree Officer tree species Tree Surgeons Tree Week tree-felling trees Trees, People and the Built Environment trust' TrustMark UAG Uitlity UK favourite ukas UKWAS urban forest Urban Tree Cover urban trees VETcert veteran trees video Videos volunteer VTA website woodland woodland trust woods young arborists

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Arboricultural Association.

Share this story

Confor demands reversal of FSC rejection of UKWAS

Last Updated:  14/11/2016

Confor is demanding that FSC International reverses its rejection of the revised UK Woodland Assurance Standard (UKWAS).

“UKWAS is the second oldest FSC national standard in the world and has been developed in an open and consensual process”, said Confor’s Technical Director Andrew Heald. “It has been regularly updated in that same consensual process and, uniquely thus far, it has been endorsed by both FSC and PEFC. This rejection by FSC International of the agreed position of a wide range of UK stakeholders is unacceptable and needs to be reversed quickly if the FSC is not to damage its reputation with the forestry sector in the UK.”

The latest revision of the UKWAS was developed by a revision team including representatives from the UK forest industry, as well as the RSPB and the Woodland Trust. There have been three rounds of open public consultation and the work was overseen by a Steering Group with over 30 members representing everyone from forest workers and land owner organisations like the CLA, to the National Trust, Forestry Commission and WWF.

Andrew Heald said:

“This rejection is baffling on many levels, particularly as FSC International’s strategy is calling for more locally adapted solutions and to focus on outcomes of forest management, and that’s just what we’ve done with this revision. Specifically, we have tried to make the document user friendly so that any forest manager can pick up the standard and easily understand what is required and how they can achieve it.”

“Confor is speaking to FSC International’s Directors and asking them to review this decision urgently. It is essential that Certification standards reflect local realities, a one size fits all standard for the whole world just won’t work.”