Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Arboricultural Association.

Share this story


#ARBatwork #ArbMatters #PledgeLessPlastic & 12 Faces of Arb 1987 storm 2018 3ATC 3ATC UK Open 50th annual AA AA award AA Awards Aboricultural Association Accident accreditation advice AFL aftercare AGM Agrilus Biguttatus aid air quality Alert Alex Kirkley All Party Parliamentary Group on Horticulture amenity Amenity Conference Ancient Tree Forum Annual Awards app APPGHG apprentice apprenticeship Apprenticeships Approved Approved Contractors ARB ARB Approved Contractor ARB Approved Contractors ARB at work ARB Magazine ARB Show arb training ArbAC ArbCamp Arboricultural Association Arboriculture arborists Arbsafe Ash ash dieback Asian Hornet Assessments atf Australia Autumn Review award Awards Barcham Trees Bark Beetle Bartlett Bartlett Tree Experts bats beetle beyond ism Bill Matthews biochar biodiversity biosecurity branch Branches brand Brexit bs5837 bursary business Call for papers Campout Canker stain of plane carbon Cavanagh CCS Cellular Confinement Systems CEnv Ceratocystis Ceratocystis platani chainsaw chalara charity Charles charter Charter for Trees chelsea Chelsea Flower Show Claus Mattheck climate climate change climber climbing Colleges committees competition competiton conference Confor conifers conservation Consultant consultation Contractor Coroner Council Countryside Stewardship Course for beginners cross industry news Crown & Canopy Cryphonectria parasitica Cumbria DART Date for your diary deadwood death defra Design Devon disease document donate dothistroma draft EAC East Anglia ecology Economic Report economy Ecotricity education Electricity England English Elm environment environmental EPF equipment Europe European Arboricultural Council European Wood Pastures exeter Exhibitors Fatal Fatality felling Fellow Fera Field Trip Fine flood flooding Forest Research forestry Forestry Commission forests FSC Fund4Trees funding fundraiser fungal fungi Futurebuild gardening GDPR Geocells Gold Medal Gov.uk government grant grants Green Brexit Green Infrastructure Green Infratructure guidance Guidance Note 2 guides Hazard Tree Health Helliwell Help Henry Kuppen History Honey Brothers Horse Chestnut horticulture horticulturists HortWeek housing HRH HRH Prince Charles HS2 HSE ICF identification industry industry skills Infographic InfraGreen Inspiration Insurance Intermediate Tree Inspection International Urban Forestry Congress Investigating Tree Archaeology Conference Ips typographus Irma irrigation ISA iso i-Tree IUFC Job job opportunity judgement JustGiving Karabiner Kew land-based Landscape Institute Landscape Show landscaping Lantra law Leaf Minor Lectures legal legislation Liability licence London longevity LTOA Magazine maple Mayor of London MBE Melbourne Member Benefit Membership mentor Midlands moth' NASA National Geographic National Tree Safety Group National Tree Week NATO New Year’s Honours News nominations Northern Northumberland notification NTIS NTOA NTOC NTSG oak 'oak Oak Processionary Moth Oak-boring Beetle obituary Observatree occupation opm Padua parks parliament Perennial Pests and Diseases petition photo Phytophthora planning Planning Law planting Plumpton College policy poll Power Preston Twins Prince Charles Prince of Wales processionary prosecution Protect and Survive protected tree protection Qualifications Quotatis ramorum RC Reg Harris Registered Registered Consultant Registered Consultants Rememberance Day renewal Report Rescue research Research grant Resilience response results retrenchment review RFS rhs RHS Chelsea Flower Show Ride for Research Ride4Research rigging Rodney Helliwell rogue tree surgeons RSFS Safety Safety Bulletin Saftey Scotland Scotland Branch Scottish Branch SDG Accord security seminars Share Sheffield Show Sierra Leone Site Guidance skills SocEnv soil soils South East South West SRWP staff statement Stationary Rope statutory STIHL strategy student Student Conference survey Sustainable Soils Alliance Sweet Chestnut sweet chestnut blight T Levels Tatarian maple TDAG technical guide Technical Guides Technical Officers Ted Green tender Thames & Chiltern The Arboricultural Association The Woodland Trust Thinking Arbs Thinking Arbs Day Timbersports Tools top-handled chainsaws,Elcoat, TPBE4 TPO Trading Standards trailblazer training transport Tree Tree Champion Tree Council Tree Fayre Tree Health Tree Inspection tree loss tree management Tree of the year Tree Officer Tree officers Tree Protection tree register tree species Tree Surgeon Tree Surgeons Tree Week Treeconomics tree-felling TreeRadar trees trees' Trees & Society Trees, People and the Built Environment trust' trustee Trustees TrustMark UAG Uitlity UK favourite ukas UKWAS urban urban forest Urban Forestry Urban Tree Cover urban trees Utility Arboriculture Group vacancy VETcert veteran trees video Videos volunteer VTA WAC Wales watering solutions webinars website Western Westonbirt Wharton Witley Women Women in Arb women in arboriculture woodland woodland trust woods World Environment Day Xylella young young arborists Young People’s Breakfast Event zoo

Arborists reminded of OPM hazard

Last Updated:  18/10/2018

Arborists in south-east England are being reminded to protect themselves this spring and summer from contact with oak processionary moth caterpillar hairs (OPM).

OPM nest after becoming discoloured with time. They are white when new. ©Ralph Parks/Forestry Commission.

OPM nest after becoming discoloured with time. They are white when new. ©Ralph Parks/Forestry Commission.

OPM nests and silken webbing trails. Nests can be attached to trunks and branches anywhere on the tree, but not among the foliage. ©Forestry Commission/Crown copyright.

OPM nests and silken webbing trails. Nests can be attached to trunks and branches anywhere on the tree, but not among the foliage. ©Forestry Commission/Crown copyright.

OPM caterpillars in classic procession. ©Henry Kuppen/Forestry Commission.

OPM caterpillars in classic procession. ©Henry Kuppen/Forestry Commission.

They are also encouraged to help control the pest by reporting sightings to the Forestry Commission, and to take care not to spread the pest when removing oak material from tree surgery sites.

As well as damaging oak trees by feeding on the leaves, the caterpillar can impact human and animal health: contact with its hairs can cause itching skin rashes, eye irritations, sore throats and other health problems. In rare cases they can cause breathing difficulties and allergic reactions. Arborists in the affected areas are therefore strongly advised to wear protective clothing.

The hairs can be blown on the wind, left in the caterpillars’ nests on and under oak trees, and can stick to bark, clothing and climbing ropes. The greatest risk period is May to July, although nests should not be approached at any time because the hairs remain active for many months.

The known affected areas include much of greater London and parts of Hertfordshire, Buckinghamshire, West Berkshire, Surrey and Essex. The affected areas are organised into ‘Core’, ‘Control’ and ‘Protected’ Zones, and maps and explanations of the regulations and procedures applying in each zone are available in the oak tree owners’ manual at www.forestry.gov.uk/opmmanual.

Report it

Andrew Hoppit, OPM programme manager, said arborists are well placed to help control the pest by reporting sightings, but he advised caution.

‘We need reports of the caterpillars and their nests from arborists, tree surgeons and ground-care workers,’

He said.

‘However, we don’t advise them to try removing them themselves. Removal requires specialist equipment and training to be done effectively.’

Mr Hoppit added,

‘Moving infested arisings from oak tree surgery is one way in which OPM can be spread, so I urge arborists in the affected areas to take the precautions recommended on our website to ensure they don’t accidentally spread the pest to new areas.’

Arborists and tree surgeons who plan to fell or prune trees in the affected areas must contact the Forestry Commission’s Plant Health Service beforehand on plant.health@forestry.gsi.gov.uk or 0300 067 5155 for advice about safe removal of the material. They should also familiarise themselves with the regulations and good practice guidance which apply to handling and disposal of oak material in the affected areas, at www.forestry.gov.uk/opm.

A video on the website depicts a number of views of OPM caterpillars and nests which arborists might encounter.

For more information…

Don’t underestimate OPM

AA Technical Officer Paul McBride sits on the OPM Strategic Advisory Group, which met in December 2017. Here is his report on that meeting.

<>When spotted early enough, isolated oak processionary moth (OPM) outbreaks can be contained, so it is vitally important that arborists and anyone inspecting trees can identify the signs of defoliation, nests and the caterpillar stage. A report can be submitted via www.forestry.gov.uk/treealert and completing the form or emailing opm@forestry.gsi.gov.uk. Tree surveyors should vary the timing and frequency of survey visits on oak trees to coincide with nest formation from early June to August.


Any arboricultural contractors regularly operating within an area roughly speaking 12 miles outside of the M25 need to be aware of the risk of exposure to the irritant hairs that the caterpillar stage of OPM produces after emergence in March/April. Irritant hairs accumulate in nests from June/July and can remain on the tree for a number of years if undetected. Sometimes the nests disintegrate slowly and sometimes they fall to the floor complete. Hairs could be dispersed up to 200m from the affected tree, so it is not surprising that human health effects will be under-reported as those affected will often not know the association.

Arboricultural contract managers and site supervisors should not underestimate the risk of repeated exposure. Individuals who regularly work on infected trees can potentially become so sensitised that they may not be able to continue working where OPM is present.

Please follow the guidance note produced by the London Tree Officers Association (LTOA): operatives must wear the appropriate level of PPE at all times when they might be exposed – www.ltoa.org.uk. Biosecurity measures that help to prevent spread will need to be robustly implemented where contact occurs.

Tree stock managers/owners within the Core Zone should continue to survey and control, but Statutory Plant Health Notices may not be issued. It is anticipated that such work will not generally be funded by Defra and this creates an opportunity for specialised contractors to remove nests. It would be preferred if such contractors could be ‘procurement approved’ by external assessment, so that clients can be reassured that appropriate systems are in place to protect the operatives involved and the public during nest removal operations.

As continued spread from the Core Zone has been observed it may have to be accepted that eradication may not be sustainable in the longer term, and attention should turn to managing the exposure risk for human health. Managers should risk assess the potential for interaction and prioritise their resources accordingly. Observations that the caterpillars appear to prefer open-grown trees and woodland edge trees to heavily shaded trees may help to direct surveying priorities where resources are limited and public access levels are known (although any such assumption risks undermining efforts to eradicate). This may shift the emphasis to removing older nests where eradication has been unsuccessful.

As the Control Zone is likely to increase radially by 20km for 2018 an increasing number of stakeholders will be affected. The LTOA has been working very hard at coordinating efforts to help limit the spread in and around London, but as the area affected spreads beyond London more people will need to get involved and communicate effectively. This does mean that some nurseries will be affected and controls on the movement of live plant material which could harbour the pest will be put in place when oak plant material is susceptible.

As the time between a new report of OPM occurrence and putting in place a suitable response can be short (a few days), challenges remain to effectively control the pest population. Increasing capacity to deliver such controls seems an inevitable requirement.

This article has been reproduced from pages 14 and 15 of the Spring 2018 – Issue 180 of the ARB Magazine. It is available to view digitally to our members at The ARB Magazine web page.